5 Reasons Visualizations do not belong in Mindfulness Meditation Training
By Mo Edjlali
Mindfulness meditation, with its deep roots in ancient traditions, stands as a beacon of self-awareness and present-mindedness. The essence of mindfulness is to embrace the present moment in all its raw authenticity. Yet, as mindfulness has grown more and more popular, a slew of techniques have been brought into this timeless practice, with visualization standing out as one of the most debated.
Today, the allure of visualization is omnipresent—from spiritual sanctuaries to competitive sports arenas, to corporate boardrooms. Even in trusted programs like MBSR, some teachers have been observed incorporating some form of visualization techniques. Within our MBRS teacher faculty at Mindful Leader, discussions on this topic are divided. While some MBSR teachers have adopted visualizations, others firmly resist. And our ongoing effort to help create ethical and inclusive mindfulness training guidelines and principles has naturally ignited these crucial internal introspections and sparked the writing of this article.
Understanding Visualization:
Visualization seeks to steer the mind toward specific images, situations, and occasionally, specific emotions or feelings. Imagine a meditation facilitator guiding participants to visualize a tranquil lake, delving not just into the sights but also the accompanying sensations of happiness or calm. While this approach has undeniable appeal for some, it begs the question: where does this fit in the tapestry of mindfulness meditation?
Challenges with Visualization:
- Philosophical Divergence: At its heart, mindfulness celebrates the acceptance of the present in its unadulterated form. Visualization's directed mental journeys might skew this, potentially pulling practitioners away from the present's raw authenticity.
- Emotional Imposition: Directing someone to feel "joy" or "relaxation" risks influencing their genuine emotional state. It runs counter to the mindfulness principle of non-attachment, subtly suggesting a hierarchy of emotions.
- Risk of Reliance: There's a potential trap where practitioners become dependent on these visualization exercises to attain serenity or happiness, sidelining the genuine cultivation of such emotions through true mindfulness.
- Power Dynamics and Potential Misuse: Visualization exercises inherently bestow a power upon the guide. Misused, especially without stringent training or with hidden agendas, this can veer into manipulative territory, with the guide having undue influence over the participant.
- Unearthing Emotional Mines: For some, what's meant to be a calming visual journey might inadvertently rekindle past traumas or distressing memories. The induced emotions, if not handled with expertise, can lead to unintended harm.
The Power of Visualization-Free Mindfulness:
- Authentic Presence: Pure mindfulness lets practitioners genuinely immerse in the moment, fostering deep self-awareness without external directives.
- Organic Discoveries: Absent the scaffolding of directed imagery or emotions, one can attain authentic self-revelations.
- Practitioner Empowerment: Classic mindfulness practices empower individuals, casting them not as mere spectators but as navigators of their inner worlds.
- Inclusivity: By steering clear of specific visual or emotional constructs, mindfulness becomes universally accessible, transcending individual experiences.
Where Does Visualization Stand?
There's no denying the broader utility of visualization in mental well-being. Yet, does it mesh with mindfulness? Are instructors truly equipped to wield this tool with sensitivity and skill, especially in the context of trauma? More fundamentally, does it align with the very ethos of mindfulness, and are there underlying risks in the teacher-student dynamic?
The challenge is twofold: ensuring that the guidance, especially when emotions are in play, augments rather than dilutes the mindfulness experience, and ensures rigorous training that equips instructors to ethically guide visualization sessions.
As the spotlight on mindfulness meditation widens, entities like Mindful Leader bear a heightened responsibility. Distinguishing the merits and potential downsides of visualization becomes paramount. This discernment will ensure that educators prioritize their students' genuine well-being and the practice's sanctity.
Final Thoughts
While visualization might find relevance in broader wellness contexts, its infusion into mindfulness raises issues.. As mindfulness burgeons as a pathway to inner tranquility and self-insight, preserving its authenticity is imperative. At Mindful Leader we believe that visualizations are not necessary in the context of mindfulness meditation.
Your thoughts? Have you intertwined visualizations in your practice? How do you see its role vis-à-vis the foundational principles of mindfulness? Please share below!
Welcome to our Wackfulness: The unexamined, sometimes silly, side of Mindfulness series, here we delve into critical thinking, alternative perspectives, and exposing collective blind spots in our field. While occasionally provocative, our intention is never to insult or disrespect beliefs. Join us for an honest debate where we aspire to grow and stay true to our shared intention.
23 comments
In my practice of paying attention, imagery plays a powerful role, but it's the act of noticing what can be seen and not the act of constructing something not there. I think there's an important difference between imagining a lake and experiencing the lake in front of us. My concern would be someone quickly reads the headline and interprets it to mean visuals aren't a part of mindfulness. I'm curious about this: in the act of cultivating compassion, we visualize other humans, however, this is a more self-directed visualization and so that may not produce as many potential harms? I wonder if "visualization" needs to be more clearly defined, and so I'll give it a shot. In this editorial, "visualization" refers to directed and guided imagery. Not the act of paying attention to existing visuals. For example, as a mindful eater, I notice how my food appears on my plate. The colors and textures there. On mindful walks, I pay close attention to the nature surrounding me. The shape of blooms, the sway of branches and the foam collecting on the edge of a river bed. In my experience, when images are part of our authentic present, they can be a powerful mindfulness tool.
I so appreciate this perspective. What comes up for me is that we are trying to cultivate equanimity - no preference - towards whatever arises in experience. If an image appears, to see it clearly is the nature of mind: there is immediate knowing of the image and that it is an image; concentration and stability of mindfulness prevents the identification with attraction / aversion and thus prevents the proliferation of ideation away from the mindful anchor. Strictly speaking, mindfulness ("sati") is used to power lovingkindness practice ("metta") but they are quite distinct, and as you note, imagery is employed skillfully in metta practice. But it is not a practice meant to develop mindfulness.
Thanks DiDi and Brian! We define visualization in the article as: "Visualization seeks to steer the mind toward specific images, situations, and occasionally, specific emotions or feelings. " I believe there is more to be explored around this - it's a juicy topic and I appreciate your comments! Also appreciate noting the distinct nature of lovingkindess practice and I believe there is more to be explored there as well.
I would assume that visualization specifically refers to calling to mind an image that is not actually there - such as when meditating with your eyes closed. When considering a lake that is actually in front of you, that is a visual, not a visualization. I agree with Mo that in general, visualization is a move away from mindfulness.
Visualizations can be used as a form of relaxation. It is prominent in learning, especially a sports skill. For example, basketball players train by visualizing shooting free throws. Studies show this can improve their skills. Mindfulness meditation is a different process. I keep them separated.
Thanks Bill, there is unique benefits, skills, risks and training in each. It makes sense to be explicit when doing one or the other and I believe it's wise to keep them separated.
I believe that imagery is of a great value while meditating and practicing the compassion toward others and myself. I also use it for healing my body. While mindfulness practice is not oriented to these, when I practice the scan body exercise, I do imagery for the sake of cleansing every part of my body that I go through. It helps me focus and in addition, I feel more present in my feelings and perceptions. While doing mindful walking meditation, I use it to, imagining that every step I take, leads me to a better place in my inner life.
If imagery doesn’t belong in these practices, I really don’t understand the reasons, if it really helps to do it better.
Thanks Fre for sharing your thoughts, for you it seems that imagery is essential to your practice. Can it also be that imagery is taking away from your practice? There are many teachers and many approaches to the body scan. In the style I learned imagery, cleansing the body and even the attitude of healing the body were discouraged. If the intention of the practice is to cultivate mindfulness I would challenge whether or not adding these elements is useful.
I just found out that my email nor any other information is registered in the MINDFUL LEADER site. How is it possible if I receive all the mails the site sends?
I even can´t access the field for requesting a password, given that my email is not register. Someone, can help with this_
Hi Fres - our newsletter subscription list and site registration are not the same - please use the Contact Us link and our team will follow up.
Thank you for this thought provoking and, for me, emotionally stirring conversation. While I do not use visualization when guiding others in mindfulness practices, I have contemplated it, simply because I do use visualization in my personal practice and find it incredibly meaningful and useful to me. I am a visual person, a visual learner and visualization helps to focus me in my practice. I can also say to the point on 'unearthing emotional mines' I wonder if this is inherently inevitable in our work to lead others in mindful practice. When I first began my mindfulness journey, body scans with no true visualizations, were very difficult for me and unearthed many "mines".
On the other side of that are those experiences where I have been led by a facilitator in a visualization that did not sit well with me and I would have said, no, it is not our role to lead others in such a way. So for me, I think it comes down to the preparation of the facilitator and the free will of the participant. Perhaps when there are visualizations being offered, there should be a distinction made or perhaps we are in need of training on how to best incorporate visualizations in a sound and ethical manner.
My lived experiences in both my MBSR course and my MBSR retreat included visualizations and they were extremely impactful in a positive and affirmative way.
Thanks Marnie for sharing your thoughts - I have personally found visualizations at times very helpful in non-mindfulness practices, and have heard feedback from many that some of the visualization practices are really powerful and some participants really like them. At the same time can we get the same benefit minus the risk? Are visualizations essential and are teachers properly trained to use them? Are disclaimers and power dynamics checked? Visualizations are very intrusive, and people are in an almost hypnotic state and very vulnerable.
So, I'm a runner, and lately I've been working on upping my game in the running department, despite my advancing age. And recently, I discovered that the best way to improve my running is actually to go for a bike ride every now and then. Riding strengthens my ankles and knees, which is just what I need to put that youthful(ish) spring back in my step.
Am I getting confused about what's running and what's riding? Not really. Am I going to stop running and switch to riding? No way. But blending a little riding into my routine has been really helpful.
This is how I see guided visualizations. When used skillfully and in the right context, it can offer people some support just where they need it - to get through a challenging block, or strengthen a weakened mental or emotional muscle. And I think that the visualizations offered in the MBSR retreat are a perfect example of this.
Thanks for your comments Andy, visualizations can be supportive to some people and in different ways. Folks should find what works for them, learn from the people who are trained to provide it, and know the benefits and risks of what is being provided. For the reasons mentioned in the article, I do not see a good case being made for mindfulness meditation to include visualizations.
I have come across led visualisations only occasionally in my training. Imagining oneself as a tree or a mountain for instance. Both were very helpful practices. One thing they can reveal is the power of our imagination (which after all is merely a 'thought' process) to have significant impact on our physical experience. This is surely a valuable lesson to learn?
I do agree though, that led visualisations are NOT mindfulness. But practicing mindful awareness of the body while subject to a led meditation can be a very powerful learning tool.
I would choose to include one such visualisation (the mountain meditation) towards the end of every 8 week course as I think it reveals something to some people because they experience it directly as a result of a 'contrived' thought process.
I do not understand mindfulness practice to be solely for the purpose of producing 'calm, peace or a relaxed state'. I engage with my practice because it teaches me more about myself, my reactions, my interior life and why I behave the way I do, than I have learned anywhere else.
I think it is interesting that the article takes the time to outline the challenges with visualizations and the benefits of visualization-free practices, but it passes over the benefits of using visualizations with only a 'broader utility' mention. I think the teaching faculty is divided for a reason; there are benefits and drawbacks, and a real debate exposes both sides to an observer, not one.
I agree wholeheartedly that visualization practices can be problematic without appropriate training in trauma-sensitivity (and good ethics). But that is also the problem with other forms of practice. Instructors/teachers have the capacity to wield power; in my view, it is the instructor, not not practice, that we should be concerned with regulating.
Finally, I will thankfully add that, so far, in my very small amount of years engaging with MBSR practices and Mindful Leader, I have not come across an instructor who has directed an emotional experience or tried to impose their own emotional discoveries on me as I practice. That may be a testament to the calibre of teachers that you have. I certainly value doing visualization practices, and I know that the practice is not about the instructor. I think that is also a testament that you can trust the wisdom and discernment of the practitioner as well.
Dear Mo, how would you say Loving-Kindness meditation fits? In the ancient traditions that mindfulness rises out of, we find that loving-kindness meditation is typically considered a necessary addition to practicing "pure" mindfulness. Loving-kindness usually has some form of visualization associated with it. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
Seems there is a place for both traditional meditation and guided practices including visualizations. I've found that giving the mind something to focus on (be it the breath, the body, or a guided journey - with our without narrative) can actually help with the very things mentioned in the article ~ a) cultivating greater presence, b) exploring profound self-revelations in the form of spontaneous imagery/symbolism and inner storytelling, and c) empowering practitioners to sharpen the tool of balancing surrender with their own agency & imagination. Personally, I appreciate visualizations that leave plenty of empty space with artfully composed language which allow the subconscious mind and the imagination to be the guide, rather than the speaker. I suppose this all comes back to how we define meditation and what it should be used for.
I utilize visualization meditations with my clients almost every day. It’s non-directive using person-centered imagery. I use these techniques to help my patients “arrive” at our sessions, which usually occur either during their work day or, shortly thereafter. It works very well in session and many report using these techniques to improve emotional regulation during times of duress. That said, I also offer grounding, being, object, walking, music and other forms of meditations as an accoutrement. As people grow in their mindful skills they learn to use several types of meditations and are free to choose which ones they like the best.
Warmly,
Rennie Grant
I have been practicing vipassana meditation for many years after receiving training at the Insight Mediation Center in Greenfield, MA. After focusing on breath and body alignment to come into my seat, I then move to a slow, systematic visualization journey from the top of my head down to my toes, and back, both seeing each body part in my mind's eye while at the same time experiencing the sensations that arise (exist) there. I don't think that is what the article means by "visualization," and perhaps a clarification on that point would be helpful.
When I was a student on an MBSR course I seem to remember being given a CD with 'mountain' and 'lake' meditations by John Kabat-Zinn. The mountain is still a favourite when I'm teaching, although I don't use the CD any more. It seems to me that the visualisation in that meditation is a way of helping people evoke a sense of equanimity so that we can have an experience of what it might be like to be equanimous. In my view it's an elaborate metaphor. I'd be surprised if any teacher didn't use metaphor in some way. Even saying 'guide your attention gently back' is a metaphor with, in my experience, an associated image. So I think visualisation is an integral part of teaching. That said I am a bit suspicious of mediations which only focus on helping us to feel calm, comfortable and happy. I think that it would be selling the power of the practice short.
Visualization is an aspect of metta practices, bring to mind someone you care about, the incidental people, those near and far. Also visualization is a natural aspect of the mind much like thought it will happen. Giving a student different tools to use is not controlling someone -it is giving them options so they can find what works—them. Unethical teachers can happen with our without visualization.
I don’t think visualization is a real problem re: mindfulness. It is how it’s being framed.
Are people aware they are visualizing seems to be more the issue. Do they know what they are doing, as they are doing it and are they aware of what they are experiencing, what comes up, in the process. But probably can be thought of as separate to avoid confusion for those who can’t separate what a mind is doing as it’s doing it.
spend some time checking out Aphantasia - we can imagine but we can't visualize - it includes 2-6% of the population.
Leave a comment